Cybersecurity Services
Security engineering across cloud, applications, vulnerability management, and compliance, scoped to the systems you actually run.
Cloud & Infrastructure Security
Azure/AWS/GCP Protection
Configuration review, IAM hardening, and monitoring across Azure, AWS, and GCP.
Learn moreabout Cloud & Infrastructure SecurityApplication Security
SAST/DAST & Secure Development
Manual testing plus SAST, DAST, and dependency scanning wired into your pipeline.
Learn moreabout Application SecurityVulnerability Management & Pentesting
Continuous Security Assessment
Penetration testing, plus the vulnerability process that stops findings piling up.
Learn moreabout Vulnerability Management & PentestingGovernance, Risk & Compliance
NIST CSF, ISO 27001, SOC 2, DORA, NIS2
ISO 27001 / SOC 2 readiness, NIST CSF & DORA alignment, NIS/NIS2 obligations.
Learn moreabout Governance, Risk & ComplianceService Details
What each engagement covers, what you receive, and what changes afterwards
Cloud & Infrastructure Security
Azure/AWS/GCP Protection
The Problem
Most cloud incidents start with configuration rather than an exploit: storage left public, IAM roles far broader than the workload needs, keys that were never rotated, and audit logging that was never switched on.
Our Approach
We baseline the estate against the CIS and provider benchmarks, close the findings that carry real blast radius first, then move those checks into CI and runtime monitoring so drift gets caught instead of rediscovered at the next audit.
Key Deliverables
- Configuration review with findings ranked by blast radius
- IAM and network segmentation redesign
- Guardrails as code (Terraform modules, policy-as-code)
- Runtime monitoring with alert routing that reaches a human
- Cloud incident response playbooks
Expected Outcomes
- Known misconfigurations closed, and blocked from returning
- Least-privilege IAM your team can actually maintain
- Drift surfaces as an alert rather than an audit finding
Application Security
SAST/DAST & Secure Development
The Problem
A security review that lands after the release is a bug report, not a control. Teams then choose between shipping and fixing, and shipping usually wins.
Our Approach
We test by hand where scanners are blind - authentication, access control, business logic - and wire SAST, DAST, and dependency scanning into CI for everything a tool can catch. We review the fixes rather than filing findings and leaving.
Key Deliverables
- Penetration test report with reproduction steps for each finding
- SAST, DAST, and dependency scanning running in CI
- Threat model covering the critical user and data flows
- Walkthrough of the findings with the developers who will fix them
Expected Outcomes
- Auth and access-control flaws found before release, not after
- The pipeline blocks the bug classes a tool can detect
- Retest evidence you can show customers and auditors
Vulnerability Management & Pentesting
Continuous Security Assessment
The Problem
Scanners produce thousands of findings and no order of work. Without an owner and a triage rule, the backlog grows until nobody trusts it, and the exploitable items sit in the same queue as the noise.
Our Approach
We test manually against your real attack surface, then set up triage that ranks findings by exploitability and exposure rather than raw CVSS, with an owner and a deadline attached to each one.
Key Deliverables
- Penetration test report with proof of exploitation
- Asset and attack surface inventory
- Risk-based triage rules your team applies without us
- Remediation roadmap with owners and deadlines
Expected Outcomes
- A backlog ordered by exploitability, not by CVSS alone
- Retest evidence that the fix actually held
Governance, Risk & Compliance
NIST CSF, ISO 27001, SOC 2, DORA, NIS2
The Problem
The penalties are set in law: GDPR reaches 4% of worldwide annual turnover, and NIS2 adds up to 2% for essential entities. Most of the work is evidence, and evidence is the part teams leave until the audit is already booked.
Our Approach
We map the controls you already run to the target framework, write only the policies that are genuinely missing, and make evidence collection part of normal operations so the audit becomes an export rather than a project.
Key Deliverables
- Control gap analysis against the target framework
- NIS2 Scope & Gap Assessment
- Governance & Policies, Roles, Supply-chain Risk
- Evidence Pack & Audit Preparation
Expected Outcomes
- A defensible gap list with a dated remediation plan
- Evidence collected continuously instead of the week before the audit
Frequently Asked Questions
The questions we get asked before every engagement
How long does a typical security assessment take?
Two to four weeks for most environments. The driver is the size of the attack surface, not the calendar. You get initial findings inside the first week so remediation can start before the report lands.
Do you provide security operations support?
We advise on it rather than staff it: process design, playbooks, alert tuning, and tooling selection, so your own team can run operations.
What compliance frameworks do you support?
ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type I and II, NIST CSF, DORA for financial services, and NIS/NIS2. We also map controls for GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS where they fall inside your scope.
Can you help with incident response?
Yes, during an incident and - more usefully - before one: response plans, playbooks, and tabletop exercises. Response times are agreed in the engagement rather than promised on a website.
How do you ensure minimal business disruption during assessments?
We agree the test window with your team up front, keep destructive techniques out of production unless you ask for them in writing, and stay reachable throughout so anything unexpected gets stopped rather than escalated.
Want a Second Opinion?
Tell us what you run and what you are worried about. We come back with scope, price, and a start date.